In this paper, I analyse Alison Landsberg’s concept of prosthetic memories from a phenomenological perspective. Prosthetic memory, while sharing similarities with both personal and collective memory, is neither exclusively personal nor strictly collective, emerging as a product of new media in mass communication. According to Landsberg, prosthetic memories have four main characteristics: the recaller experiences them as firsthand accounts despite not personally living through the events, these memories often revolve around traumatic events, have a commodified form, and are ethically useful. Using Husserl’s theories on memory consciousness and image consciousness, and contemporary phenomenological research on violence, I provide a phenomenological account for the first three characteristics of prosthetic memory. The key factors contributing to their quasi-personal and quasi-collective nature lie, on the one hand, in the presence of imagistic violence and, on the other hand, in their mass-mediated image character.
Program: “Phenomenology and Media: Mapping the Structures of Post-Cinematic Experience” (Annual Conference of the Romanian Society for Phenomenology, 19-21 November 2026)
Phenomenology and Media: Mapping the Structures of Post-Cinematic Experience Annual Conference of the Romanian Society for Phenomenology, 19-21 November 2026 National University for Theatre and Film, Bucharest [map] Program [DOWNLOAD PDF] 19.11.2026 - DAY 1...